Suspension time – How many times and for what? Registration fees generally most often give a company the right to suspend or defer a requested registration (or request for a takeover) in certain circumstances, when the company is required to disclose essential non-public information prematurely. It is understandable that the company reserves the power to suspend registration and prevent the early disclosure of this information. However, the ability of a company to suspend registration generally depends on the frequency and duration of the suspension period. Sponsors should focus on these provisions to ensure that the company is not able to effectively block its sales capacity during favorable market windows. Make it easier to sell blocks. Once a company has achieved a certain „seasoned“ status, it may no longer be necessary to make significant (or none) marketing efforts related to a SEC-registered share distribution. Without the opposition of a marketing process, an investor may be able to sell a large number of shares efficiently and quickly by arranging the acquisition of a block of shares through a registered „purchase“ or „block sale.“ These transactions are common among investors who focus on fixing short market windows (for example. B, an investor could ask a company to file an automatic registration statement on Form S-3 and immediately make a bulk sale under that shelf). Many registration rights agreements do not consider this type of transaction appropriately or explicitly, as market practice has generally outpaced registration fee technology. In order to obtain the flexibility to facilitate effective and timely implementation, these provisions should be developed with the nature and date (if any) of the piggyback notifications that a demanding investor must send to right holders when considering selling securities in bulk.
Similarly, since the speed of success of bulk sales has not been realized, investors should also consider when the company must file the registration statement and require further SEC returns for the transaction activity after a block sale request. The fact is that most practitioners, when the round occurs later, try to encourage pre-skilled holders (who often overlap with investors in the later round)  to terminate the previous agreement and accept a new provision that applies to all existing incumbents, old and new, in the same way. Alternatively, lawyers for early investors can trade under rules that limit the issuer when approving the registration of the shares of subsequent buyers – either an absolute ban without the consent of former investors or a priority in their favour. The issue of inconsistent registration rights provisions, which are routed through separate agreements for each cycle, is indeed sensitive. If the company`s standard is that the rights should not be due for three years from the date of the investment, what to do with investors in previous rounds who have held shares for almost three years? Will they have the first exclusive chance to have access to public securities? If the A-Series was sold last year (with a 51 per cent trigger) and the current favourite B-series is sold, is it possible to force Series A holders to join Series B (provided the number of shares in each series is the same) to avoid a situation where the trigger is suddenly held at 25.1 per cent (compared to 51 per cent) of the stock of the preferred share? Is the language of the agreement such that investors can claim, in previous cycles, to have a first priority for listing their shares in a „loon“? Finally, the inclusion of one`s own shares in a publicly signed offer is not the only way to sell shares.